Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Samsung Galaxy S26vsApple iPhone 17

The short answer

Choose the Galaxy S26 for battery life per charge and 3DMark graphics score. Choose the iPhone 17 for peak brightness. The iPhone 17 is £80 cheaper at UK RRP (£799 against £879). The Galaxy S26 gets security updates until February 2033; Apple publishes no date for the iPhone 17, and its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036, our estimate, not Apple’s. On that estimate neither clearly gets them for longer.

Released
2026-03-06endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£879Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy S26 series, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2033-02-28Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy S26, retrieved 2026-09-22
Released
2025-09-19endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£799Apple UK store, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-20

2 wins for Galaxy S261 win for iPhone 175 gaps borderline1 difference you won’t notice£80 apart at RRP

Verdict: Galaxy S26 ahead on 2 rows, iPhone 17 on 1 row

On the makers’ figures and the named third-party sources, the Galaxy S26 wins on battery per charge (51 h against 41 h) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (6,531 against 4,715, both from 3DMark); the iPhone 17 wins on peak brightness (3,000 nits from the maker against 2,600 nits from GSMArena). 5 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: RAM (12 GB from the maker against 8 GB from GSMArena) for the Galaxy S26, battery capacity (4,300 mAh from the maker against 3,692 mAh from GSMArena) for the Galaxy S26, battery lifespan (1,200 cycles against 1,000 cycles) for the Galaxy S26, fast charging (40 W against 25 W) for the iPhone 17 and wireless charging (25 W from the maker against 15 W from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17. The difference in weight is below the threshold you would notice. Both state the same display size, refresh rate, storage (base) and claimed video playback. The other 37 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

True to scale

Galaxy S26 · 149.6 × 71.7 mmiPhone 17 · 149.6 × 71.5 mm

Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
149.6 x 71.7 x 7.2 mmOfficial
149.6 x 71.5 x 7.95 mmOfficial
Weight

You won’t notice this difference.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame3rd party
Aluminium design, Ceramic Shield 2 front, Colour-infused glass back (Black, Mist Blue, Sage, Lavender)Official
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) — international3rd party
Dual SIM (nano-SIM and eSIM); Dual eSIM supportOfficial
Water/dust ratingSame.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
Fingerprint SensorOfficial
Face ID (TrueDepth camera)Official

Display

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz adaptive, Vision boosterOfficial
Super Retina XDR OLED, Always-On, HDR, True Tone, Wide colour (P3)Official
Display sizeSame.
ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
1080 x 23403rd party
2622 x 1206Official
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
411ppi3rd party
460ppiOfficial
Refresh rateSame.
Peak brightness
2600nits3rd party
3000nitsOfficialwins this row

iPhone 17 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Typical brightness
No verified data
1000nitsOfficial
HDR peak brightness
No verified data
1200nitsOfficial
Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 23rd party
Ceramic Shield 2 frontOfficial

Platform

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Android 16, One UI 8.5Official
iOS 263rd party
OS versions supported
No verified data
iOS 26 to iOS 27Official
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
Exynos 2600Official
A19 chipOfficial
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
10-core (1x3.80GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.25GHz C1-Pro, 6x2.75GHz C1-Pro)3rd party
6-core CPU with 2 performance and 4 efficiency coresOfficial
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Xclipse 9603rd party
5-core GPU with Neural AcceleratorsOfficial

Memory

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Storage (base)Same.
Storage optionsSame.
256GB/512GBOfficial
256GB/512GBOfficial
RAM

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50MP Wide f/1.8 with 2x optical-quality zoom; 10MP Telephoto 3x optical zoom f/2.4; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2; 12MP front f/2.2Official
48MP Dual Fusion camera system: 48MP Fusion Main 26mm f/1.6 with sensor-shift OIS; 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide 13mm f/2.2 120°; Fusion Main also enables 12MP optical-quality 2x Telephoto 52mm f/1.6Official
Main sensor resolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
Main apertureDiffers, but not ranked.
Main sensor sizeSame.
1/1.56"3rd party
1/1.56"3rd party
TelephotoDiffers, but not ranked.
10MP Telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4Official
12MP optical-quality 2x Telephoto, 52mm, f/1.6, sensor-shift OIS (enabled by 48MP Fusion Main)Official
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2Official
48MP Fusion Ultra Wide, 13mm, f/2.2, 120° field of viewOfficial
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
12MP front, f/2.2Official
18MP Center Stage, f/1.9 aperture, autofocus with Focus PixelsOfficial
Video captureDiffers, but not ranked.
8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, HDR10+3rd party
4K Dolby Vision at 24, 25, 30 or 60 fpsOfficial

Battery

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Battery capacity
4300mAhOfficial
3692mAh3rd party

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Battery per charge
51hOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S26 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Claimed video playbackSame.
Battery lifespan
1200cyclesOfficial
1000cyclesOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Fast charging

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Wireless charging

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Connectivity

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 7Official
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMOOfficial
BluetoothDiffers, but not ranked.
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG3rd party
USB-C, USB 2 (up to 480Mb/s), DisplayPortOfficial
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS3rd party
Precision dual-frequency GPS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou and NavIC)Official

Benchmarks

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core)
No verified data
AnTuTu benchmark
28275383rd party
No verified data
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
65313rd partywins this row

Galaxy S26 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

DXOMARK camera scoreDiffers, but not ranked.

Misc

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
Cobalt Violet, White, Black, Sky Blue, Pink Gold, Silver ShadowOfficial
Black, White, Mist Blue, Sage, LavenderOfficial
SAR (EU, head)Differs, but not ranked.
1.21W/kg3rd party
1.49W/kg3rd party
Repairability (EU class)Same.
1 attribute neither phone has a sourced figure for

Google Mobile Services. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Galaxy S26 better than the iPhone 17?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Galaxy S26 wins on battery per charge, 51 h against 41 h (both EU energy label) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, 6,531 against 4,715 (both 3DMark); the iPhone 17 wins on peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Galaxy S26, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 51 h against 41 h (both EU energy label). Both state 30 h for claimed video playback (Samsung UK and Apple UK). The Galaxy S26 is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 4,300 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 3,692 mAh (GSMArena), a borderline gap most people would not notice.

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy S26 is lighter on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: weight, 167 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 177 g (Apple UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The iPhone 17, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Galaxy S26 gets security updates until February 2033; Apple publishes no date for the iPhone 17, and its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036, our estimate, not Apple’s. On that estimate neither clearly gets them for longer. Sources: dates from Samsung UK spec API; Apple’s record from endoflife.date and Apple security releases.

Which is cheaper?

The iPhone 17 is £80 cheaper at UK RRP (£799 against £879). Prices from Galaxy S26: Samsung Newsroom UK; iPhone 17: Apple UK store.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.