Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEvsMotorola razr 60 ultra

The short answer

Choose the Motorola razr 60 ultra for peak brightness, more base storage, more RAM and battery life per charge. Choose the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE for battery lifespan. The Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is £251 cheaper at UK RRP (£849 against £1,100). The Galaxy Z Flip7 FE gets security updates for longer: until July 2032, against February 2029 for the Motorola razr 60 ultra.

Released
2025-07-25Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy Z Fold7, Flip7 and Watch8 launch, retrieved 2026-09-10
Price
£849Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy Z Flip7, retrieved 2026-09-10
Security updates until
2032-07-31Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy Z Flip7 FE, retrieved 2026-09-22
Released
2025-04-25GSMArena — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra specifications, retrieved 2026-09-10
Price
£1,100Motorola UK — motorola razr 60 ultra, retrieved 2026-09-10
Security updates until
2029-02-28Motorola UK — motorola razr 60 ultra, retrieved 2026-09-22

1 win for Galaxy Z Flip7 FE4 wins for Motorola razr 60 ultra2 gaps borderline1 difference you won’t notice£251 apart at RRP

Verdict: Motorola razr 60 ultra ahead on 4 rows, Galaxy Z Flip7 FE on 1 row

On the makers’ published figures, the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins on battery lifespan (1,700 cycles against 1,000 cycles); the razr 60 ultra wins on peak brightness (4,500 nits against 2,600 nits), storage (base) (512 GB against 128 GB), RAM (16 GB against 8 GB) and battery per charge (48.8 h against 37.05 h). 2 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: display size (7 in against 6.7 in) for the razr 60 ultra and battery capacity (4,700 mAh against 4,000 mAh) for the razr 60 ultra. The difference in weight is below the threshold you would notice. The other 36 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

True to scale

Galaxy Z Flip7 FE · 85.1 × 71.9 mmrazr 60 ultra · 88.12 × 73.99 mm

Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
85.1 x 71.9 x 14.9 mmOfficial
88.12 x 73.99 x 15.69 mmOfficial
Weight
187gOfficial
199gOfficial

You won’t notice this difference.

Build
No verified data
Front: Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic; rear: Alcantara / FSC-certified wood / satin-inspired / leather-inspired finishOfficial
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Nano-SIM + eSIM / Dual eSIMOfficial
eSIM + physical SIMOfficial
Water/dust rating
No verified data
IP48Official
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
Fingerprint SensorOfficial
Side fingerprint reader | Face unlockOfficial

Display

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
Main: Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz; Cover: Super AMOLEDOfficial
Main: LTPO foldable AMOLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 10-bit, up to 165Hz; Cover: LTPO flexible AMOLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 165HzOfficial
Display size
6.7inOfficial
7inOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
2640 x 1080Official
2992 x 1224Official
Pixel density
No verified data
464ppiOfficial
Refresh rate
120HzOfficial
165HzOfficial
Peak brightness
2600nitsOfficial
4500nitsOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Screen protection
No verified data
Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic (cover)Official

Platform

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Android 16, One UI 8Official
Android 15Official
Chipset
No verified data
Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile PlatformOfficial
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Deca-Core, 3.2GHz, 2.9GHz, 2.6GHz, 1.95GHzOfficial
3nm octa-core (2 prime + 6 performance), up to 4.32GHzOfficial
GPU
No verified data
Qualcomm AdrenoOfficial

Memory

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
Storage (base)
128GBOfficial
512GBOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Storage options
128GB/256GBOfficial
No verified data
RAM
8GBOfficial
16GBOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Card slotSame.
No3rd party
No3rd party

Camera

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50MP Wide Dual Pixel AF OIS f/1.8; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2; 10MP front f/2.2Official
50MP main f/1.8 OIS 1/1.56" Instant-all Pixel Focus; 50MP ultrawide + macro f/2.0 FOV 122°; 50MP inner selfie f/2.0Official
Main sensor resolutionSame.
50MPOfficial
50MPOfficial
Main apertureSame.
f/1.8Official
f/1.8Official
Main sensor sizeDiffers, but not ranked.
1/1.57"3rd party
1/1.56"Official
TelephotoDiffers, but not ranked.
No dedicated telephoto lens; 2x optical-quality zoom from the 50MP Adaptive Pixel wide cameraOfficial
No dedicated telephoto lensOfficial
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2Official
50MP ultrawide + macro, f/2.0, FOV 122°Official
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
10MP front, f/2.2Official
Inner 50MP f/2.0 (or 12.5MP Quad Pixel)Official
Video capture
UHD 4K (3840 x 2160)@60fpsOfficial
No verified data

Battery

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
Battery capacity
4000mAhOfficial
4700mAhOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Battery per charge
37.05hOfficial
48.8hOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Claimed video playback
24hOfficial
No verified data
Battery lifespan
1700cyclesOfficialwins this row
1000cyclesOfficial

Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Fast charging
No verified data
68WOfficial
Wireless charging
No verified data
30WOfficial

Connectivity

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Official
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Official
Bluetooth
5.4Official
No verified data
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1Official
USB Type-COfficial
NFCSame.
YesOfficial
YesOfficial
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, QZSSOfficial
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeidouOfficial

Benchmarks

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
No verified data
58313rd party

Misc

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FEMotorola razr 60 ultra
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
Black, WhiteOfficial
PANTONE Mountain Trail, Scarab, Rio Red, CabaretOfficial
SAR (EU, head)
0.84W/kg3rd party
No verified data
Repairability (EU class)Differs, but not ranked.
COfficial
BOfficial
7 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for

Typical brightness · HDR peak brightness · OS versions supported · Google Mobile Services · Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core) · AnTuTu benchmark · DXOMARK camera score. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than the Motorola razr 60 ultra?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins on battery lifespan, 1,700 cycles against 1,000 cycles (both EU energy label); the Motorola razr 60 ultra wins on peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Motorola UK) against 2,600 nits (Samsung UK), storage (base), 512 GB (Motorola UK) against 128 GB (Samsung Newsroom UK), RAM, 16 GB (Motorola UK) against 8 GB (Samsung UK) and battery per charge, 48.8 h against 37.05 h (both EU energy label). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Motorola razr 60 ultra, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 48.8 h against 37.05 h (both EU energy label). The Motorola razr 60 ultra is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 4,700 mAh (Motorola UK) against 4,000 mAh (Samsung UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice.

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is lighter on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: weight, 187 g (Samsung UK) against 199 g (Motorola UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The Motorola razr 60 ultra, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Motorola UK) against 2,600 nits (Samsung UK).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 FE gets security updates for longer: until July 2032, against February 2029 for the Motorola razr 60 ultra. Sources: dates from Samsung UK spec API and Motorola UK.

Which is cheaper?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is £251 cheaper at UK RRP (£849 against £1,100). Prices from Galaxy Z Flip7 FE: Samsung Newsroom UK; Motorola razr 60 ultra: Motorola UK.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.