Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsMotorola razr 60 ultra

The short answer

Choose the Motorola razr 60 ultra for peak brightness, more base storage, battery life per charge, faster charging, faster wireless charging and 3DMark graphics score. Choose the Galaxy Z Flip7 for battery lifespan. The Galaxy Z Flip7 is £51 cheaper at UK RRP (£1,049 against £1,100). The Galaxy Z Flip7 gets security updates for longer: until July 2032, against February 2029 for the Motorola razr 60 ultra.

Released
2025-07-25endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£1,049Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy Z Flip7, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2032-07-31Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy Z Flip7, retrieved 2026-09-22
Released
2025-04-25GSMArena — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra specifications, retrieved 2026-09-10
Price
£1,100Motorola UK — motorola razr 60 ultra, retrieved 2026-09-10
Security updates until
2029-02-28Motorola UK — motorola razr 60 ultra, retrieved 2026-09-22

1 win for Galaxy Z Flip76 wins for Motorola razr 60 ultra1 gap borderline3 differences you won’t notice£51 apart at RRP

Verdict: Motorola razr 60 ultra ahead on 6 rows, Galaxy Z Flip7 on 1 row

On the makers’ figures and the named third-party sources, the Galaxy Z Flip7 wins on battery lifespan (2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles); the razr 60 ultra wins on peak brightness (4,500 nits against 2,600 nits), storage (base) (512 GB against 256 GB), battery per charge (48.8 h against 42.07 h), fast charging (68 W against 25 W), wireless charging (30 W from the maker against 15 W from GSMArena) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (5,831 against 4,373, both from 3DMark). One gap is borderline, a difference most people would not notice: battery capacity (4,700 mAh against 4,300 mAh) for the razr 60 ultra. The differences in weight, display size and RAM are below the thresholds you would notice. The other 34 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
Unfolded 166.7 x 75.2 x 6.5 mm; folded 85.5 x 75.2 x 13.7 mmOfficial
88.12 x 73.99 x 15.69 mmOfficial
Weight

You won’t notice this difference.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Gorilla Glass Victus 2 cover and back, Armor Aluminum frameOfficial
Front: Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic; rear: Alcantara / FSC-certified wood / satin-inspired / leather-inspired finishOfficial
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)3rd party
eSIM + physical SIMOfficial
Water/dust ratingSame.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
Fingerprint SensorOfficial
Side fingerprint reader | Face unlockOfficial

Display

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
Main: Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz adaptive (1~120Hz); Cover FlexWindow: Super AMOLED, 120Hz, Vision BoosterOfficial
Main: LTPO foldable AMOLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 10-bit, up to 165Hz; Cover: LTPO flexible AMOLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 165HzOfficial
Display size

You won’t notice this difference.

ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
1080 x 2520Official
2992 x 1224Official
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
397ppi3rd party
464ppiOfficial
Refresh rate
Peak brightness
2600nitsOfficial
4500nitsOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Official
Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic (cover)Official

Platform

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Android 16, One UI 8Official
Android 15Official
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
Exynos 2500Official
Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile PlatformOfficial
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
10-core (1x3.3GHz Cortex-X925 & 2x2.74GHz Cortex-A725 & 5x2.36GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520)3rd party
3nm octa-core (2 prime + 6 performance), up to 4.32GHzOfficial
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Xclipse 9503rd party
Qualcomm AdrenoOfficial

Memory

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
Storage (base)
512GBOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Storage options
256GB/512GBOfficial
No verified data
RAM

You won’t notice this difference.

Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50MP Wide Dual Pixel AF OIS f/1.8; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2 FOV 123°; 10MP front f/2.2Official
50MP main f/1.8 OIS 1/1.56" Instant-all Pixel Focus; 50MP ultrawide + macro f/2.0 FOV 122°; 50MP inner selfie f/2.0Official
Main sensor resolutionSame.
Main apertureSame.
Main sensor sizeDiffers, but not ranked.
1/1.57"3rd party
1/1.56"Official
Telephoto
No verified data
No dedicated telephoto lensOfficial
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2, FOV 123°Official
50MP ultrawide + macro, f/2.0, FOV 122°Official
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
10MP front, f/2.2Official
Inner 50MP f/2.0 (or 12.5MP Quad Pixel)Official
Video capture
4K@30/60fps, HDR10+3rd party
No verified data

Battery

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
Battery capacity
4300mAhOfficial
4700mAhOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Battery per charge
42.07hOfficial
48.8hOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Claimed video playback
No verified data
Battery lifespan
2000cyclesOfficialwins this row
1000cyclesOfficial

Galaxy Z Flip7 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Fast charging
68WOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Wireless charging
30WOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Connectivity

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 7Official
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Official
Bluetooth
No verified data
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-C 3.2, OTG3rd party
USB Type-COfficial
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS3rd party
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeidouOfficial

Benchmarks

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
58313rd partywins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

DXOMARK camera score
No verified data

Misc

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7Motorola razr 60 ultra
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
Blue Shadow, Jetblack, Coral-red, MintOfficial
PANTONE Mountain Trail, Scarab, Rio Red, CabaretOfficial
SAR (EU, head)
0.69W/kg3rd party
No verified data
Repairability (EU class)Differs, but not ranked.
6 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for

Typical brightness · HDR peak brightness · OS versions supported · Google Mobile Services · Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core) · AnTuTu benchmark. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Galaxy Z Flip7 better than the Motorola razr 60 ultra?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Galaxy Z Flip7 wins on battery lifespan, 2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles (both EU energy label); the Motorola razr 60 ultra wins on peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Motorola UK) against 2,600 nits (Samsung Newsroom UK), storage (base), 512 GB (Motorola UK) against 256 GB (Samsung Newsroom UK), battery per charge, 48.8 h against 42.07 h (both EU energy label), fast charging, 68 W (Motorola UK) against 25 W (Samsung Newsroom UK), wireless charging, 30 W (Motorola UK) against 15 W (GSMArena) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, 5,831 against 4,373 (both 3DMark). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Motorola razr 60 ultra, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 48.8 h against 42.07 h (both EU energy label). The Motorola razr 60 ultra is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 4,700 mAh (Motorola UK) against 4,300 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice.

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is lighter on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: weight, 188 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 199 g (Motorola UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The Motorola razr 60 ultra, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Motorola UK) against 2,600 nits (Samsung Newsroom UK).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 gets security updates for longer: until July 2032, against February 2029 for the Motorola razr 60 ultra. Sources: dates from Samsung UK spec API and Motorola UK.

Which is cheaper?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is £51 cheaper at UK RRP (£1,049 against £1,100). Prices from Galaxy Z Flip7: Samsung Newsroom UK; Motorola razr 60 ultra: Motorola UK.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.