Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Nothing Phone (3)vsSamsung Galaxy S25

The short answer

Choose the Nothing Phone (3) for peak brightness, more base storage, battery capacity, battery life per charge and faster charging. Choose the Galaxy S25 for lower weight, battery lifespan and 3DMark graphics score. The Nothing Phone (3) is £100 cheaper at UK RRP (£699 against £799). The Nothing Phone (3) gets security updates for longer: until July 2032, against January 2032 for the Galaxy S25.

Released
2025-07-15GSMArena — Nothing Phone (3) specifications, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£699Nothing UK store — Phone (3), retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2032-07-15Nothing UK — Phone (3), retrieved 2026-08-20
Released
2025-02-03endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£799Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy S25 series, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2032-01-31Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy S25, retrieved 2026-09-22

5 wins for Nothing Phone (3)3 wins for Galaxy S251 gap borderline0 differences you won’t notice£100 apart at RRP

Verdict: Nothing Phone (3) ahead on 5 rows, Galaxy S25 on 3 rows

On the makers’ figures and the named third-party sources, the Phone (3) wins on peak brightness (4,500 nits from the maker against 2,600 nits from GSMArena), storage (base) (256 GB against 128 GB), battery capacity (5,150 mAh against 4,000 mAh), battery per charge (56.38 h against 37.27 h) and fast charging (65 W from the maker against 25 W from GSMArena); the Galaxy S25 wins on weight (162 g against 218 g), battery lifespan (2,000 cycles against 1,400 cycles) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (5,664 against 4,291, both from 3DMark). One gap is borderline, a difference most people would not notice: display size (6.67 in against 6.2 in) for the Phone (3). Both state the same refresh rate, RAM and wireless charging. The other 35 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

True to scale

Phone (3) · 160.60 × 75.59 mmGalaxy S25 · 146.9 × 70.5 mm

Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
160.60 x 75.59 x 8.99 mmOfficial
146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mmOfficial
Weight
162gOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S25 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass 7i front and back, precision-machined anti-fingerprint aluminium frameOfficial
Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame3rd party
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Dual SIM, Nano-SIM (4FF) + eSIMOfficial
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) — international3rd party
Water/dust ratingSame.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
In-display fingerprint sensorOfficial
Fingerprint SensorOfficial

Display

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
6.67" flexible AMOLED, 120 Hz adaptive, 10-bitOfficial
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Super Smooth 120Hz, Vision booster, Adaptive colour toneOfficial
Display size
6.67inOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
1260 x 2800Official
1080 x 23403rd party
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
460ppiOfficial
416ppi3rd party
Refresh rateSame.
Peak brightness
4500nitsOfficialwins this row
2600nits3rd party

Phone (3) is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Typical brightness
800nitsOfficial
No verified data
Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass 7iOfficial
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 23rd party

Platform

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Nothing OS 4 powered by Android 16Official
Android 15, One UI 7Official
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8S Gen 4Official
Snapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyOfficial
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Qualcomm Kryo 8-core, up to 3.21 GHz (1x Cortex-X4 up to 3.2 GHz + 7x Cortex-A720 up to 3.0 GHz)Official
Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)3rd party
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Qualcomm Adreno 825Official
Adreno 8303rd party

Memory

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Storage (base)
256GBOfficialwins this row

Phone (3) is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Storage optionsDiffers, but not ranked.
256GB/512GBOfficial
128GB/256GB/512GBOfficial
RAMSame.
Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50 MP main (f/1.68, 1/1.3") + 50 MP periscope (f/2.68, 3x optical) + 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 114°) + 50 MP frontOfficial
50MP Wide f/1.8 OIS; 10MP Telephoto 3x optical zoom f/2.4; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2 FOV 120°; 12MP front f/2.2Official
Main sensor resolutionSame.
Main apertureDiffers, but not ranked.
f/1.68Official
Main sensor sizeDiffers, but not ranked.
1/1.3"Official
1/1.56"3rd party
TelephotoDiffers, but not ranked.
50 MP periscope, f/2.68, 1/2.75", 3x optical zoom, 6x in-sensor zoom, 60x ultra zoom, OIS & EIS, autofocusOfficial
10MP Telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4Official
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
50 MP, f/2.2, 114° FOV, 1/2.76"Official
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2, FOV 120°Official
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50 MP, f/2.2, 1/2.76", 81.2° FOVOfficial
12MP front, f/2.2Official
Video captureDiffers, but not ranked.
Ultra XDR video at 60/30 fps; 1080p Ultra XDR at 60/30 fps; slo-mo 1080p 240/120 fps; time-lapse 4K/1080pOfficial
8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+3rd party

Battery

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Battery capacity
5150mAhOfficialwins this row
4000mAhOfficial

Phone (3) is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Battery per charge
56.38hOfficialwins this row
37.27hOfficial

Phone (3) is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Claimed video playback
No verified data
Battery lifespan
1400cyclesOfficial
2000cyclesOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S25 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Fast charging
65WOfficialwins this row

Phone (3) is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Wireless chargingSame.

Connectivity

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 7, 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be, 2.4G/5G/6G tri-bandOfficial
Wi-Fi 7Official
BluetoothDiffers, but not ranked.
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG3rd party
USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG3rd party
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
L1+L5 dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC and SBASOfficial
GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS3rd party

Benchmarks

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core)
No verified data
AnTuTu benchmark
No verified data
25830393rd party
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
56643rd partywins this row

Galaxy S25 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Misc

SpecificationNothing Phone (3)Samsung Galaxy S25
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
White, BlackOfficial
Silver Shadow, Navy, Icy blue, MintOfficial
SAR (EU, head)
No verified data
1.29W/kg3rd party
Repairability (EU class)Same.
4 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for

HDR peak brightness · OS versions supported · Google Mobile Services · DXOMARK camera score. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Nothing Phone (3) better than the Galaxy S25?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Nothing Phone (3) wins on peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Nothing UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena), storage (base), 256 GB (Nothing UK) against 128 GB (Samsung Newsroom UK), battery capacity, 5,150 mAh (Nothing UK) against 4,000 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK), battery per charge, 56.38 h against 37.27 h (both EU energy label) and fast charging, 65 W (Nothing UK) against 25 W (GSMArena); the Galaxy S25 wins on weight, 162 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 218 g (Nothing UK), battery lifespan, 2,000 cycles against 1,400 cycles (both EU energy label) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, 5,664 against 4,291 (both 3DMark). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Nothing Phone (3), by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 56.38 h against 37.27 h (both EU energy label). The Nothing Phone (3), by a gap you’d notice: battery capacity, 5,150 mAh (Nothing UK) against 4,000 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK).

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy S25, by a gap you’d notice: weight, 162 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 218 g (Nothing UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The Nothing Phone (3), by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Nothing UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Nothing Phone (3) gets security updates for longer: until July 2032, against January 2032 for the Galaxy S25. Sources: dates from Nothing UK and Samsung UK spec API.

Which is cheaper?

The Nothing Phone (3) is £100 cheaper at UK RRP (£699 against £799). Prices from Nothing Phone (3): Nothing UK store; Galaxy S25: Samsung Newsroom UK.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.