Head to head
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The short answer
Choose the Pixel 10 Pro Fold for peak brightness and battery life per charge. Choose the Galaxy Z Fold7 for lower weight and battery lifespan. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold is £50 cheaper at UK RRP (£1,749 against £1,799). The Pixel 10 Pro Fold gets security updates for longer: until October 2032, against July 2032 for the Galaxy Z Fold7.
- Released
- 2025-10-04endoflife.date — Pixel, retrieved 2026-09-10
- Price
- £1,749Google Store UK — Pixel 10 Pro Fold specs, retrieved 2026-09-10
- Security updates until
- 2032-10-01endoflife.date — Pixel, retrieved 2026-09-10
- Released
- 2025-07-25Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy Z Fold7, Flip7 and Watch8 launch, retrieved 2026-09-10
- Price
- £1,799Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy Z Fold7, retrieved 2026-09-10
- Security updates until
- 2032-07-31Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy Z Fold7, retrieved 2026-09-22
2 wins for Pixel 10 Pro Fold2 wins for Galaxy Z Fold71 gap borderline2 differences you won’t notice£50 apart at RRP
Verdict: Pixel 10 Pro Fold ahead on 2 rows, Galaxy Z Fold7 on 2 rows
On the makers’ published figures, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold wins on peak brightness (3,000 nits against 2,600 nits) and battery per charge (47.92 h against 40.47 h); the Galaxy Z Fold7 wins on weight (215 g against 258 g) and battery lifespan (2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles). One gap is borderline, a difference most people would not notice: battery capacity (5,015 mAh against 4,400 mAh) for the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. The differences in RAM and fast charging are below the thresholds you would notice. Both state the same display size, refresh rate and storage (base). The other 36 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.
True to scale
Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.
Specifications
A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.
Body
Display
Platform
Memory
Camera
Battery
Connectivity
Benchmarks
5 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for
Typical brightness · OS versions supported · Google Mobile Services · GPU · AnTuTu benchmark. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.
Questions
Is the Pixel 10 Pro Fold better than the Galaxy Z Fold7?
On the figures, neither is better overall: the Pixel 10 Pro Fold wins on peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Google) against 2,600 nits (Samsung Newsroom UK) and battery per charge, 47.92 h against 40.47 h (both EU energy label); the Galaxy Z Fold7 wins on weight, 215 g (Samsung UK) against 258 g (Google) and battery lifespan, 2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles (both EU energy label). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.
Which has the better battery?
The Pixel 10 Pro Fold, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 47.92 h against 40.47 h (both EU energy label). The Pixel 10 Pro Fold is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 5,015 mAh (Google) against 4,400 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice.
Which is lighter?
The Galaxy Z Fold7, by a gap you’d notice: weight, 215 g (Samsung UK) against 258 g (Google).
Which has the brighter screen?
The Pixel 10 Pro Fold, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Google) against 2,600 nits (Samsung Newsroom UK).
Which gets updates for longer?
The Pixel 10 Pro Fold gets security updates for longer: until October 2032, against July 2032 for the Galaxy Z Fold7. Sources: dates from endoflife.date and Samsung UK spec API.
Which is cheaper?
The Pixel 10 Pro Fold is £50 cheaper at UK RRP (£1,749 against £1,799). Prices from Pixel 10 Pro Fold: Google Store UK; Galaxy Z Fold7: Samsung Newsroom UK.
Other comparisons
The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.