Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Motorola razr 60 ultravsSamsung Galaxy S25

The short answer

Choose the Motorola razr 60 ultra for the larger screen, peak brightness, more base storage, battery life per charge, faster charging and faster wireless charging. Choose the Galaxy S25 for lower weight and battery lifespan. The Galaxy S25 is £301 cheaper at UK RRP (£799 against £1,100). The Galaxy S25 gets security updates for longer: until January 2032, against February 2029 for the Motorola razr 60 ultra.

Released
2025-04-25GSMArena — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra specifications, retrieved 2026-09-10
Price
£1,100Motorola UK — motorola razr 60 ultra, retrieved 2026-09-10
Security updates until
2029-02-28Motorola UK — motorola razr 60 ultra, retrieved 2026-09-22
Released
2025-02-03endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£799Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy S25 series, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2032-01-31Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy S25, retrieved 2026-09-22

6 wins for Motorola razr 60 ultra2 wins for Galaxy S251 gap borderline2 differences you won’t notice£301 apart at RRP

Verdict: Motorola razr 60 ultra ahead on 6 rows, Galaxy S25 on 2 rows

On the makers’ figures and the named third-party sources, the razr 60 ultra wins on display size (7 in against 6.2 in), peak brightness (4,500 nits from the maker against 2,600 nits from GSMArena), storage (base) (512 GB against 128 GB), battery per charge (48.8 h against 37.27 h), fast charging (68 W from the maker against 25 W from GSMArena) and wireless charging (30 W from the maker against 15 W from GSMArena); the Galaxy S25 wins on weight (162 g against 199 g) and battery lifespan (2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles). One gap is borderline, a difference most people would not notice: battery capacity (4,700 mAh against 4,000 mAh) for the razr 60 ultra. The differences in RAM and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme are below the thresholds you would notice. The other 35 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

True to scale

razr 60 ultra · 88.12 × 73.99 mmGalaxy S25 · 146.9 × 70.5 mm

Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
88.12 x 73.99 x 15.69 mmOfficial
146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mmOfficial
Weight
162gOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S25 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Front: Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic; rear: Alcantara / FSC-certified wood / satin-inspired / leather-inspired finishOfficial
Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame3rd party
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
eSIM + physical SIMOfficial
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) — international3rd party
Water/dust ratingDiffers, but not ranked.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
Side fingerprint reader | Face unlockOfficial
Fingerprint SensorOfficial

Display

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
Main: LTPO foldable AMOLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 10-bit, up to 165Hz; Cover: LTPO flexible AMOLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 165HzOfficial
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Super Smooth 120Hz, Vision booster, Adaptive colour toneOfficial
Display size
7inOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
2992 x 1224Official
1080 x 23403rd party
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
464ppiOfficial
416ppi3rd party
Refresh rate
Peak brightness
4500nitsOfficialwins this row
2600nits3rd party

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic (cover)Official
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 23rd party

Platform

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Android 15Official
Android 15, One UI 7Official
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile PlatformOfficial
Snapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyOfficial
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
3nm octa-core (2 prime + 6 performance), up to 4.32GHzOfficial
Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)3rd party
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Qualcomm AdrenoOfficial
Adreno 8303rd party

Memory

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Storage (base)
512GBOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Storage options
No verified data
128GB/256GB/512GBOfficial
RAM

You won’t notice this difference.

Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50MP main f/1.8 OIS 1/1.56" Instant-all Pixel Focus; 50MP ultrawide + macro f/2.0 FOV 122°; 50MP inner selfie f/2.0Official
50MP Wide f/1.8 OIS; 10MP Telephoto 3x optical zoom f/2.4; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2 FOV 120°; 12MP front f/2.2Official
Main sensor resolutionSame.
Main apertureSame.
Main sensor sizeSame.
1/1.56"Official
1/1.56"3rd party
TelephotoDiffers, but not ranked.
No dedicated telephoto lensOfficial
10MP Telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4Official
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
50MP ultrawide + macro, f/2.0, FOV 122°Official
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2, FOV 120°Official
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
Inner 50MP f/2.0 (or 12.5MP Quad Pixel)Official
12MP front, f/2.2Official
Video capture
No verified data
8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+3rd party

Battery

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Battery capacity
4700mAhOfficial
4000mAhOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Battery per charge
48.8hOfficialwins this row
37.27hOfficial

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Claimed video playback
No verified data
Battery lifespan
1000cyclesOfficial
2000cyclesOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S25 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Fast charging
68WOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Wireless charging
30WOfficialwins this row

razr 60 ultra is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Connectivity

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Official
Wi-Fi 7Official
Bluetooth
No verified data
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-COfficial
USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG3rd party
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeidouOfficial
GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS3rd party

Benchmarks

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core)
No verified data
AnTuTu benchmark
No verified data
25830393rd party
3DMark Wild Life Extreme

You won’t notice this difference.

Misc

SpecificationMotorola razr 60 ultraSamsung Galaxy S25
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
PANTONE Mountain Trail, Scarab, Rio Red, CabaretOfficial
Silver Shadow, Navy, Icy blue, MintOfficial
SAR (EU, head)
No verified data
1.29W/kg3rd party
Repairability (EU class)Differs, but not ranked.
5 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for

Typical brightness · HDR peak brightness · OS versions supported · Google Mobile Services · DXOMARK camera score. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Motorola razr 60 ultra better than the Galaxy S25?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Motorola razr 60 ultra wins on display size, 7 in (Motorola UK) against 6.2 in (Samsung Newsroom UK), peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Motorola UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena), storage (base), 512 GB (Motorola UK) against 128 GB (Samsung Newsroom UK), battery per charge, 48.8 h against 37.27 h (both EU energy label), fast charging, 68 W (Motorola UK) against 25 W (GSMArena) and wireless charging, 30 W (Motorola UK) against 15 W (GSMArena); the Galaxy S25 wins on weight, 162 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 199 g (Motorola UK) and battery lifespan, 2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles (both EU energy label). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Motorola razr 60 ultra, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 48.8 h against 37.27 h (both EU energy label). The Motorola razr 60 ultra is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 4,700 mAh (Motorola UK) against 4,000 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice.

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy S25, by a gap you’d notice: weight, 162 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 199 g (Motorola UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The Motorola razr 60 ultra, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 4,500 nits (Motorola UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Galaxy S25 gets security updates for longer: until January 2032, against February 2029 for the Motorola razr 60 ultra. Sources: dates from Motorola UK and Samsung UK spec API.

Which is cheaper?

The Galaxy S25 is £301 cheaper at UK RRP (£799 against £1,100). Prices from Motorola razr 60 ultra: Motorola UK; Galaxy S25: Samsung Newsroom UK.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.