Head to head
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsApple iPhone 15 Pro
The short answer
Choose the iPhone 17 Pro for peak brightness, more base storage and video playback time. The iPhone 15 Pro wins no row by a gap you’d notice. Apple publishes no date for either; its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036 for the iPhone 17 Pro and 2030–2034 for the iPhone 15 Pro, our estimate, not Apple’s.
- Released
- 2025-09-19endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Price
- £1,099Apple UK store, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Security updates until
- Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Released
- 2023-09-22endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Security updates until
- Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-19
3 wins for iPhone 17 Pro0 wins for iPhone 15 Pro7 gaps borderline0 differences you won’t notice
Verdict: iPhone 17 Pro ahead on 3 rows, iPhone 15 Pro on none
On the makers’ published figures, the iPhone 17 Pro wins on peak brightness (3,000 nits against 2,000 nits), storage (base) (256 GB against 128 GB) and claimed video playback (31 h against 23 h). 7 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: weight (187 g against 204 g) for the iPhone 15 Pro, display size (6.3 in against 6.1 in) for the iPhone 17 Pro, RAM (12 GB against 8 GB, both from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17 Pro, battery capacity (3,998 mAh against 3,274 mAh, both from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17 Pro, fast charging (40 W against 20 W) for the iPhone 17 Pro, wireless charging (25 W against 15 W) for the iPhone 17 Pro and Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core) (8,770 against 6,830, both from Geekbench Browser) for the iPhone 17 Pro. Both state the same refresh rate, typical brightness and HDR peak brightness. The other 36 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.
True to scale
Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.
Specifications
A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.
Body
Display
Platform
Memory
Camera
Battery
Connectivity
Benchmarks
2 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for
Google Mobile Services · AnTuTu benchmark. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.
Questions
Is the iPhone 17 Pro better than the iPhone 15 Pro?
On the figures, the iPhone 17 Pro is ahead wherever there is a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,000 nits (Apple Support UK), storage (base), 256 GB (Apple UK) against 128 GB (Apple Support UK) and claimed video playback, 31 h against 23 h (both Apple UK). The iPhone 15 Pro wins no row by such a gap. That is a count of rows, not an overall score.
Which has the better battery?
The iPhone 17 Pro, by a gap you’d notice: claimed video playback, 31 h against 23 h (both Apple UK). The iPhone 17 Pro is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 3,998 mAh against 3,274 mAh (both GSMArena), a borderline gap most people would not notice.
Which is lighter?
The iPhone 15 Pro is lighter, narrowly: weight, 187 g (Apple Support UK) against 204 g (Apple UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice.
Which has the brighter screen?
The iPhone 17 Pro, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,000 nits (Apple Support UK). Both state 1,000 nits for typical brightness (Apple UK and Apple Support UK). Both state 1,600 nits for HDR peak brightness (Apple UK).
Which gets updates for longer?
Apple publishes no date for either; its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036 for the iPhone 17 Pro and 2030–2034 for the iPhone 15 Pro, our estimate, not Apple’s. Sources: Apple’s record from endoflife.date and Apple security releases.
Other comparisons
The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.