Head to head
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsApple iPhone 16 Pro
The short answer
Choose the iPhone 17 Pro for peak brightness, more base storage and battery life per charge. The iPhone 16 Pro wins no row by a gap you’d notice. Apple publishes no date for either; its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036 for the iPhone 17 Pro and 2031–2035 for the iPhone 16 Pro, our estimate, not Apple’s.
- Released
- 2025-09-19endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Price
- £1,099Apple UK store, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Security updates until
- Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Released
- 2024-09-20endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-19
- Security updates until
- Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-19
3 wins for iPhone 17 Pro0 wins for iPhone 16 Pro6 gaps borderline1 difference you won’t notice
Verdict: iPhone 17 Pro ahead on 3 rows, iPhone 16 Pro on none
On the makers’ published figures, the iPhone 17 Pro wins on peak brightness (3,000 nits against 2,000 nits), storage (base) (256 GB against 128 GB) and battery per charge (47 h against 37 h). 6 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: RAM (12 GB against 8 GB, both from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17 Pro, battery capacity (3,998 mAh against 3,582 mAh, both from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17 Pro, claimed video playback (31 h against 27 h) for the iPhone 17 Pro, fast charging (40 W against 20 W) for the iPhone 17 Pro, Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core) (8,770 against 7,788, both from Geekbench Browser) for the iPhone 17 Pro and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (5,304 against 4,248, both from 3DMark) for the iPhone 17 Pro. The difference in weight is below the threshold you would notice. Both state the same display size, refresh rate, typical brightness, HDR peak brightness, battery lifespan and wireless charging. The other 33 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.
True to scale
Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.
Specifications
A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.
Body
Display
Platform
Memory
Camera
Battery
Connectivity
Benchmarks
2 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for
Google Mobile Services · AnTuTu benchmark. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.
Questions
Is the iPhone 17 Pro better than the iPhone 16 Pro?
On the figures, the iPhone 17 Pro is ahead wherever there is a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,000 nits (Apple Support UK), storage (base), 256 GB (Apple UK) against 128 GB (Apple Support UK) and battery per charge, 47 h against 37 h (both EU energy label). The iPhone 16 Pro wins no row by such a gap. That is a count of rows, not an overall score.
Which has the better battery?
The iPhone 17 Pro, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 47 h against 37 h (both EU energy label). The iPhone 17 Pro is ahead, narrowly: claimed video playback, 31 h against 27 h (both Apple UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice. The iPhone 17 Pro is ahead, narrowly: battery capacity, 3,998 mAh against 3,582 mAh (both GSMArena), a borderline gap most people would not notice.
Which is lighter?
The iPhone 16 Pro is lighter on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: weight, 199 g (Apple Support UK) against 204 g (Apple UK).
Which has the brighter screen?
The iPhone 17 Pro, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,000 nits (Apple Support UK). Both state 1,000 nits for typical brightness (Apple UK and Apple Support UK). Both state 1,600 nits for HDR peak brightness (Apple UK).
Which gets updates for longer?
Apple publishes no date for either; its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036 for the iPhone 17 Pro and 2031–2035 for the iPhone 16 Pro, our estimate, not Apple’s. Sources: Apple’s record from endoflife.date and Apple security releases.
Other comparisons
The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.