Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Xiaomi Xiaomi 17TvsSamsung Galaxy S26

The short answer

Choose the Xiaomi 17T for peak brightness, battery capacity, battery life per charge and faster charging. Choose the Galaxy S26 for lower weight and 3DMark graphics score. The Xiaomi 17T is £230 cheaper at UK RRP (£649 against £879). Only the Galaxy S26 has a published security end date (February 2033); Xiaomi publishes none for the Xiaomi 17T.

Released
2026-05-28GSMArena — Xiaomi 17T specifications, retrieved 2026-08-21
Security updates until
Not published by the makerXiaomi UK — Xiaomi 17T specs, retrieved 2026-08-21
Released
2026-03-06endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£879Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy S26 series, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2033-02-28Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy S26, retrieved 2026-09-22

4 wins for Xiaomi 17T2 wins for Galaxy S262 gaps borderline0 differences you won’t notice£230 apart at RRP

Verdict: Xiaomi 17T ahead on 4 rows, Galaxy S26 on 2 rows

On the makers’ figures and the named third-party sources, the Xiaomi 17T wins on peak brightness (3,500 nits from the maker against 2,600 nits from GSMArena), battery capacity (6,500 mAh against 4,300 mAh), battery per charge (65.67 h against 51 h) and fast charging (67 W against 25 W); the Galaxy S26 wins on weight (167 g against 200 g) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (6,531 against 3,980, both from 3DMark). 2 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: display size (6.59 in against 6.3 in) for the Xiaomi 17T and battery lifespan (1,200 cycles against 1,000 cycles) for the Galaxy S26. Both state the same refresh rate, storage (base) and RAM. The other 35 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

True to scale

Xiaomi 17T · 157.6 × 75.2 mmGalaxy S26 · 149.6 × 71.7 mm

Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
157.6 x 75.2 x 8.17 mmOfficial
149.6 x 71.7 x 7.2 mmOfficial
Weight
167gOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S26 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, glass-fiber reinforced plastic back (Gorilla Glass 7i)3rd party
Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame3rd party
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Dual SIM (nano SIM + nano SIM or nano SIM + eSIM, eSIM + eSIM)Official
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) — international3rd party
Water/dust ratingSame.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
In-screen fingerprint sensor, AI Face UnlockOfficial
Fingerprint SensorOfficial

Display

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
6.59" 120Hz eye-care AMOLED, 12-bit, HDR10+, Dolby VisionOfficial
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz adaptive, Vision boosterOfficial
Display size
6.59inOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
2756 x 1268Official
1080 x 23403rd party
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
460ppiOfficial
411ppi3rd party
Refresh rateSame.
Peak brightness
3500nitsOfficialwins this row
2600nits3rd party

Xiaomi 17T is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass 7iOfficial
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 23rd party

Platform

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Xiaomi HyperOS 3Official

Xiaomi UK — Xiaomi 17T specs claims Xiaomi HyperOS 3 · GSMArena — Xiaomi 17T specifications reports Android 16, HyperOS 3

Android 16, One UI 8.5Official
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4nm)Official
Exynos 2600Official
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
1x Cortex-A725 up to 3.4GHz + 3x Cortex-A725 up to 3.2GHz + 4x Cortex-A725 up to 2.2GHzOfficial
10-core (1x3.80GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.25GHz C1-Pro, 6x2.75GHz C1-Pro)3rd party
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Mali-G720 MC8Official
Xclipse 9603rd party

Memory

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
Storage (base)Same.
Storage optionsSame.
256GB/512GBOfficial
256GB/512GBOfficial
RAMSame.
Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
Leica 50 MP main (f/1.7, 1/1.55", OIS, 23mm) + 50 MP periscope (f/3.0, 115mm, OIS) + 12 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 15mm, 120°)Official
50MP Wide f/1.8 with 2x optical-quality zoom; 10MP Telephoto 3x optical zoom f/2.4; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2; 12MP front f/2.2Official
Main sensor resolutionSame.
Main apertureDiffers, but not ranked.
Main sensor sizeDiffers, but not ranked.
1/1.55"Official
1/1.56"3rd party
TelephotoDiffers, but not ranked.
Leica 50 MP periscope, f/3.0, 115mm equivalent, OISOfficial
10MP Telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4Official
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
Leica 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm equivalent, 120°Official
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2Official
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm equivalentOfficial
12MP front, f/2.2Official
Video captureDiffers, but not ranked.
4K HDR10+@30/60fps, 1080p HDR10+@30/60fps, Log up to 4K@30/60fps, slow-mo 1080p/720p up to 960fpsOfficial
8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, HDR10+3rd party

Battery

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
Battery capacity
6500mAhOfficialwins this row
4300mAhOfficial

Xiaomi 17T is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Battery per charge
65.67hOfficialwins this row

Xiaomi 17T is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Claimed video playback
No verified data
Battery lifespan
1000cyclesOfficial
1200cyclesOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Fast charging
67WOfficialwins this row

Xiaomi 17T is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Wireless charging
No verified data

Connectivity

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 6EOfficial
Wi-Fi 7Official
BluetoothDiffers, but not ranked.
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG3rd party
USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG3rd party
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
GPS L1+L5, GLONASS G1, Beidou B1I+B1C+B2a, Galileo E1+E5a, NavIC L5, QZSS L1+L5, A-GPSOfficial
GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS3rd party

Benchmarks

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
AnTuTu benchmarkDiffers, but not ranked.
20268283rd party
28275383rd party
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
65313rd partywins this row

Galaxy S26 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

DXOMARK camera score
No verified data

Misc

SpecificationXiaomi 17TSamsung Galaxy S26
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
Black, Opal White, Blue, VioletOfficial
Cobalt Violet, White, Black, Sky Blue, Pink Gold, Silver ShadowOfficial
SAR (EU, head)
No verified data
1.21W/kg3rd party
Repairability (EU class)Same.
5 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for

Typical brightness · HDR peak brightness · OS versions supported · Google Mobile Services · Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core). Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Xiaomi 17T better than the Galaxy S26?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Xiaomi 17T wins on peak brightness, 3,500 nits (Xiaomi UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena), battery capacity, 6,500 mAh (Xiaomi UK) against 4,300 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK), battery per charge, 65.67 h against 51 h (both EU energy label) and fast charging, 67 W (Xiaomi UK) against 25 W (Samsung Newsroom UK); the Galaxy S26 wins on weight, 167 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 200 g (Xiaomi UK) and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, 6,531 against 3,980 (both 3DMark). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Xiaomi 17T, by a gap you’d notice: battery per charge, 65.67 h against 51 h (both EU energy label). The Xiaomi 17T, by a gap you’d notice: battery capacity, 6,500 mAh (Xiaomi UK) against 4,300 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK).

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy S26, by a gap you’d notice: weight, 167 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 200 g (Xiaomi UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The Xiaomi 17T, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,500 nits (Xiaomi UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena).

Which gets updates for longer?

Only the Galaxy S26 has a published security end date (February 2033); Xiaomi publishes none for the Xiaomi 17T. Sources: dates from Samsung UK spec API.

Which is cheaper?

The Xiaomi 17T is £230 cheaper at UK RRP (£649 against £879). Prices from Xiaomi 17T: Xiaomi UK store; Galaxy S26: Samsung Newsroom UK.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.