Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Samsung Galaxy S26vsApple iPhone 17 Pro

The short answer

Choose the Galaxy S26 for lower weight. Choose the iPhone 17 Pro for peak brightness. The Galaxy S26 is £220 cheaper at UK RRP (£879 against £1,099). The Galaxy S26 gets security updates until February 2033; Apple publishes no date for the iPhone 17 Pro, and its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036, our estimate, not Apple’s. On that estimate neither clearly gets them for longer.

Released
2026-03-06endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£879Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy S26 series, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2033-02-28Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy S26, retrieved 2026-09-22
Released
2025-09-19endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-19
Price
£1,099Apple UK store, retrieved 2026-08-19
Security updates until
Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-19

1 win for Galaxy S261 win for iPhone 17 Pro5 gaps borderline2 differences you won’t notice£220 apart at RRP

Verdict: Galaxy S26 ahead on 1 row, iPhone 17 Pro on 1 row

On the makers’ figures and the named third-party sources, the Galaxy S26 wins on weight (167 g against 204 g); the iPhone 17 Pro wins on peak brightness (3,000 nits from the maker against 2,600 nits from GSMArena). 5 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: battery per charge (51 h against 47 h) for the Galaxy S26, battery lifespan (1,200 cycles against 1,000 cycles) for the Galaxy S26, fast charging (40 W against 25 W) for the iPhone 17 Pro, wireless charging (25 W from the maker against 15 W from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17 Pro and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (6,531 against 5,304, both from 3DMark) for the Galaxy S26. The differences in battery capacity and claimed video playback are below the thresholds you would notice. Both state the same display size, refresh rate, storage (base) and RAM. The other 37 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

True to scale

Galaxy S26 · 149.6 × 71.7 mmiPhone 17 Pro · 150 × 71.9 mm

Outlines from each maker’s published dimensions, drawn to scale. Corner rounding is our drawing convention, not a measurement.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
149.6 x 71.7 x 7.2 mmOfficial
150 x 71.9 x 8.75 mmOfficial
Weight
167gOfficialwins this row

Galaxy S26 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame3rd party
Aluminium unibody design, Ceramic Shield 2 front, Ceramic Shield backOfficial
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) — international3rd party
Dual SIM (nano-SIM and eSIM); Dual eSIM supportOfficial
Water/dust ratingSame.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
Fingerprint SensorOfficial
Face ID (TrueDepth camera)Official

Display

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz adaptive, Vision boosterOfficial
Super Retina XDR OLED, Always-On, HDR, True Tone, Wide colour (P3)Official
Display sizeSame.
ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
1080 x 23403rd party
2622 x 1206Official
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
411ppi3rd party
460ppiOfficial
Refresh rateSame.
Peak brightness
2600nits3rd party
3000nitsOfficialwins this row

iPhone 17 Pro is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Typical brightness
No verified data
1000nitsOfficial
HDR peak brightness
No verified data
1600nitsOfficial
Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 23rd party
Ceramic Shield 2 frontOfficial

Platform

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
Android 16, One UI 8.5Official
iOS 263rd party
OS versions supported
No verified data
iOS 26 to iOS 27Official
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
Exynos 2600Official
A19 Pro chipOfficial
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
10-core (1x3.80GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.25GHz C1-Pro, 6x2.75GHz C1-Pro)3rd party
6-core CPU with 2 performance and 4 efficiency coresOfficial
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
Xclipse 9603rd party
6-core GPU with Neural AcceleratorsOfficial

Memory

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Storage (base)Same.
Storage optionsDiffers, but not ranked.
256GB/512GBOfficial
256GB/512GB/1TBOfficial
RAMSame.
Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
50MP Wide f/1.8 with 2x optical-quality zoom; 10MP Telephoto 3x optical zoom f/2.4; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2; 12MP front f/2.2Official
48MP Pro Fusion camera system: 48MP Fusion Main 24mm f/1.78 with second-generation sensor-shift OIS; 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide 13mm f/2.2 120°; 48MP Fusion Telephoto 100mm 4x f/2.8 tetraprism; Fusion Main also enables 12MP optical-quality 2x Telephoto 48mm f/1.78; Fusion Telephoto also enables 12MP optical-quality 8x Telephoto 200mm f/2.8Official
Main sensor resolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
Main apertureDiffers, but not ranked.
f/1.78Official
Main sensor sizeDiffers, but not ranked.
1/1.56"3rd party
1/1.28"3rd party
TelephotoDiffers, but not ranked.
10MP Telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4Official
48MP Fusion Telephoto, 100mm (4x), f/2.8, tetraprism, 3D sensor-shift OIS; also enables 12MP optical-quality 8x Telephoto 200mm f/2.8Official
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2Official
48MP Fusion Ultra Wide, 13mm, f/2.2, 120° field of viewOfficial
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
12MP front, f/2.2Official
18MP Center Stage, f/1.9 aperture, autofocus with Focus PixelsOfficial
Video captureDiffers, but not ranked.
8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, HDR10+3rd party
4K Dolby Vision at 24, 25, 30, 60, 100 or 120 fps (Fusion Main)Official

Battery

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Battery capacity
4300mAhOfficial
3998mAh3rd party

You won’t notice this difference.

Battery per charge

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Claimed video playback

You won’t notice this difference.

Battery lifespan
1200cyclesOfficial
1000cyclesOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Fast charging

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Wireless charging

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Connectivity

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 7Official
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMOOfficial
BluetoothDiffers, but not ranked.
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG3rd party
USB-C, USB 3 (up to 10Gb/s), DisplayPortOfficial
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS3rd party
Precision dual-frequency GPS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou and NavIC)Official

Benchmarks

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core)
No verified data
AnTuTu benchmark
28275383rd party
No verified data
3DMark Wild Life Extreme

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

DXOMARK camera scoreDiffers, but not ranked.

Misc

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy S26Apple iPhone 17 Pro
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
Cobalt Violet, White, Black, Sky Blue, Pink Gold, Silver ShadowOfficial
Silver, Cosmic Orange, Deep BlueOfficial
SAR (EU, head)Differs, but not ranked.
1.21W/kg3rd party
1.49W/kg3rd party
Repairability (EU class)Same.
1 attribute neither phone has a sourced figure for

Google Mobile Services. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the Galaxy S26 better than the iPhone 17 Pro?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the Galaxy S26 wins on weight, 167 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 204 g (Apple UK); the iPhone 17 Pro wins on peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The Galaxy S26 is ahead, narrowly: battery per charge, 51 h against 47 h (both EU energy label), a borderline gap most people would not notice. The iPhone 17 Pro is ahead on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: claimed video playback, 31 h (Apple UK) against 30 h (Samsung UK). The Galaxy S26 is ahead on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: battery capacity, 4,300 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 3,998 mAh (GSMArena).

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy S26, by a gap you’d notice: weight, 167 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 204 g (Apple UK).

Which has the brighter screen?

The iPhone 17 Pro, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,600 nits (GSMArena).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Galaxy S26 gets security updates until February 2033; Apple publishes no date for the iPhone 17 Pro, and its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036, our estimate, not Apple’s. On that estimate neither clearly gets them for longer. Sources: dates from Samsung UK spec API; Apple’s record from endoflife.date and Apple security releases.

Which is cheaper?

The Galaxy S26 is £220 cheaper at UK RRP (£879 against £1,099). Prices from Galaxy S26: Samsung Newsroom UK; iPhone 17 Pro: Apple UK store.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.