Skip to content
MobileIQ

Head to head

Apple iPhone 17 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The short answer

Choose the Galaxy Z Flip7 for the larger screen and battery lifespan. Choose the iPhone 17 Pro for peak brightness. The Galaxy Z Flip7 is £50 cheaper at UK RRP (£1,049 against £1,099). The Galaxy Z Flip7 gets security updates until July 2032; Apple publishes no date for the iPhone 17 Pro, and its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036, our estimate, not Apple’s. On that estimate neither clearly gets them for longer.

Released
2025-09-19endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-19
Price
£1,099Apple UK store, retrieved 2026-08-19
Security updates until
Not published by the makerendoflife.date — iPhone, retrieved 2026-08-19
Released
2025-07-25endoflife.date, retrieved 2026-08-20
Price
£1,049Samsung Newsroom UK — Galaxy Z Flip7, retrieved 2026-08-20
Security updates until
2032-07-31Samsung UK spec API — Galaxy Z Flip7, retrieved 2026-09-22

1 win for iPhone 17 Pro2 wins for Galaxy Z Flip75 gaps borderline1 difference you won’t notice£50 apart at RRP

Verdict: Galaxy Z Flip7 ahead on 2 rows, iPhone 17 Pro on 1 row

On the makers’ published figures, the iPhone 17 Pro wins on peak brightness (3,000 nits against 2,600 nits); the Galaxy Z Flip7 wins on display size (6.9 in against 6.3 in) and battery lifespan (2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles). 5 gaps are borderline, differences most people would not notice: weight (188 g against 204 g) for the Galaxy Z Flip7, battery per charge (47 h against 42.07 h) for the iPhone 17 Pro, fast charging (40 W against 25 W) for the iPhone 17 Pro, wireless charging (25 W from the maker against 15 W from GSMArena) for the iPhone 17 Pro and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme (5,304 against 4,373, both from 3DMark) for the iPhone 17 Pro. The difference in battery capacity is below the threshold you would notice. Both state the same refresh rate, storage (base), RAM and claimed video playback. The other 36 rows have no threshold or no direction to judge by, so nobody wins them.

Specifications

A win is marked only where the figures can be ranked and the gap is one you could notice. A row the site has no threshold for says whether the two differ, and that it is not ranking them. = marks the same figure on both, ≠ not ranked a difference with no ranking. Every figure carries its source.

Body

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
DimensionsDiffers, but not ranked.
150 x 71.9 x 8.75 mmOfficial
Unfolded 166.7 x 75.2 x 6.5 mm; folded 85.5 x 75.2 x 13.7 mmOfficial
Weight

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

BuildDiffers, but not ranked.
Aluminium unibody design, Ceramic Shield 2 front, Ceramic Shield backOfficial
Gorilla Glass Victus 2 cover and back, Armor Aluminum frameOfficial
SIMDiffers, but not ranked.
Dual SIM (nano-SIM and eSIM); Dual eSIM supportOfficial
Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)3rd party
Water/dust ratingDiffers, but not ranked.
UnlockDiffers, but not ranked.
Face ID (TrueDepth camera)Official
Fingerprint SensorOfficial

Display

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Display typeDiffers, but not ranked.
Super Retina XDR OLED, Always-On, HDR, True Tone, Wide colour (P3)Official
Main: Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz adaptive (1~120Hz); Cover FlexWindow: Super AMOLED, 120Hz, Vision BoosterOfficial
Display size
6.9inOfficialwins this row

Galaxy Z Flip7 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

ResolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
2622 x 1206Official
1080 x 2520Official
Pixel densityDiffers, but not ranked.
460ppiOfficial
397ppi3rd party
Refresh rateSame.
Peak brightness
3000nitsOfficialwins this row
2600nitsOfficial

iPhone 17 Pro is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Typical brightness
1000nitsOfficial
No verified data
HDR peak brightness
1600nitsOfficial
No verified data
Screen protectionDiffers, but not ranked.
Ceramic Shield 2 frontOfficial
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Official

Platform

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Operating systemDiffers, but not ranked.
iOS 263rd party
Android 16, One UI 8Official
OS versions supported
iOS 26 to iOS 27Official
No verified data
ChipsetDiffers, but not ranked.
A19 Pro chipOfficial
Exynos 2500Official
CPUDiffers, but not ranked.
6-core CPU with 2 performance and 4 efficiency coresOfficial
10-core (1x3.3GHz Cortex-X925 & 2x2.74GHz Cortex-A725 & 5x2.36GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520)3rd party
GPUDiffers, but not ranked.
6-core GPU with Neural AcceleratorsOfficial
Xclipse 9503rd party

Memory

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Storage (base)Same.
Storage optionsDiffers, but not ranked.
256GB/512GB/1TBOfficial
256GB/512GBOfficial
RAMSame.
Card slotSame.

Camera

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Main cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
48MP Pro Fusion camera system: 48MP Fusion Main 24mm f/1.78 with second-generation sensor-shift OIS; 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide 13mm f/2.2 120°; 48MP Fusion Telephoto 100mm 4x f/2.8 tetraprism; Fusion Main also enables 12MP optical-quality 2x Telephoto 48mm f/1.78; Fusion Telephoto also enables 12MP optical-quality 8x Telephoto 200mm f/2.8Official
50MP Wide Dual Pixel AF OIS f/1.8; 12MP Ultra-Wide f/2.2 FOV 123°; 10MP front f/2.2Official
Main sensor resolutionDiffers, but not ranked.
Main apertureDiffers, but not ranked.
f/1.78Official
Main sensor sizeDiffers, but not ranked.
1/1.28"3rd party
1/1.57"3rd party
Telephoto
48MP Fusion Telephoto, 100mm (4x), f/2.8, tetraprism, 3D sensor-shift OIS; also enables 12MP optical-quality 8x Telephoto 200mm f/2.8Official
No verified data
UltrawideDiffers, but not ranked.
48MP Fusion Ultra Wide, 13mm, f/2.2, 120° field of viewOfficial
12MP Ultra-Wide, f/2.2, FOV 123°Official
Front cameraDiffers, but not ranked.
18MP Center Stage, f/1.9 aperture, autofocus with Focus PixelsOfficial
10MP front, f/2.2Official
Video captureDiffers, but not ranked.
4K Dolby Vision at 24, 25, 30, 60, 100 or 120 fps (Fusion Main)Official
4K@30/60fps, HDR10+3rd party

Battery

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Battery capacity
3998mAh3rd party
4300mAhOfficial

You won’t notice this difference.

Battery per charge
42.07hOfficial

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Claimed video playbackSame.
Battery lifespan
1000cyclesOfficial
2000cyclesOfficialwins this row

Galaxy Z Flip7 is ahead here, by a gap you’d notice.

Fast charging

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Wireless charging

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

Connectivity

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Wi-FiDiffers, but not ranked.
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMOOfficial
Wi-Fi 7Official
BluetoothDiffers, but not ranked.
USBDiffers, but not ranked.
USB-C, USB 3 (up to 10Gb/s), DisplayPortOfficial
USB Type-C 3.2, OTG3rd party
NFCSame.
PositioningDiffers, but not ranked.
Precision dual-frequency GPS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou and NavIC)Official
GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS3rd party

Benchmarks

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Geekbench 6 (CPU, multi-core)
No verified data
3DMark Wild Life Extreme

Marginal — most people won’t notice.

DXOMARK camera scoreDiffers, but not ranked.

Misc

SpecificationApple iPhone 17 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7
ColoursDiffers, but not ranked.
Silver, Cosmic Orange, Deep BlueOfficial
Blue Shadow, Jetblack, Coral-red, MintOfficial
SAR (EU, head)Differs, but not ranked.
1.49W/kg3rd party
0.69W/kg3rd party
Repairability (EU class)Same.
2 attributes neither phone has a sourced figure for

Google Mobile Services · AnTuTu benchmark. Rows appear as sources are cited — a gap in our data, not a statement about either phone.

Questions

Is the iPhone 17 Pro better than the Galaxy Z Flip7?

On the figures, neither is better overall: the iPhone 17 Pro wins on peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,600 nits (Samsung Newsroom UK); the Galaxy Z Flip7 wins on display size, 6.9 in (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 6.3 in (Apple UK) and battery lifespan, 2,000 cycles against 1,000 cycles (both EU energy label). Every other row is borderline, too close to notice, or not ranked.

Which has the better battery?

The iPhone 17 Pro is ahead, narrowly: battery per charge, 47 h against 42.07 h (both EU energy label), a borderline gap most people would not notice. Both state 31 h for claimed video playback (Apple UK and Samsung UK). The Galaxy Z Flip7 is ahead on paper, but not by a gap you’d notice: battery capacity, 4,300 mAh (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 3,998 mAh (GSMArena).

Which is lighter?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is lighter, narrowly: weight, 188 g (Samsung Newsroom UK) against 204 g (Apple UK), a borderline gap most people would not notice.

Which has the brighter screen?

The iPhone 17 Pro, by a gap you’d notice: peak brightness, 3,000 nits (Apple UK) against 2,600 nits (Samsung Newsroom UK).

Which gets updates for longer?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 gets security updates until July 2032; Apple publishes no date for the iPhone 17 Pro, and its record with retired iPhones points to 2032–2036, our estimate, not Apple’s. On that estimate neither clearly gets them for longer. Sources: dates from Samsung UK spec API; Apple’s record from endoflife.date and Apple security releases.

Which is cheaper?

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is £50 cheaper at UK RRP (£1,049 against £1,099). Prices from iPhone 17 Pro: Apple UK store; Galaxy Z Flip7: Samsung Newsroom UK.

The pairs a buyer of either phone would also weigh. Any two phones in the catalogue can be compared from the chooser.